One analyst. Four jobs it already does
Exergy Lab turns messy energy and industrial data into decision briefs that separate machine-verified results from what stays explicitly unverified. Ten deterministic screening engines sit underneath — waste-heat and district-heating recovery, wastewater heat pumps, utility economics and emissions, bounded PV, desalination, SOEC fabrication time, battery thermal identifiability, and thin-wall cylindrical membranes.
Screen more sites. Audit the ones that pay.
Walk into every engagement with numbers instead of a blank page. Run deterministic screens on the data you already have — utility bills, interval data, nameplate specs — and see the math behind every result before you scope a full audit.
Each decision brief separates machine-checked calculations from assumptions that still need field data, so you know exactly what is solid and what needs a site visit.
What you get
- Deterministic screening runs with traceable inputs and formulas
- Client-ready exported briefs and charts you can put your own brand on
- A claim ledger marking what was computed versus what is still assumed
- A short list of the measurements that would tighten the numbers most
Know if an opportunity is real before you fund a study.
Upload a recent utility bill or power data and get an economic and environmental screen of your own consumption: what you are spending, emitting, and where the leverage is.
Considering waste-heat recovery or a district-heating connection? Screen the recovery economics first. A walk-through ASHRAE Level 1 audit typically runs about $5,000–$15,000 for a 100,000 sq ft building (typical market range; it varies by region and provider), so a screening pass that rules an option out — or firms it up — is budget well spent.
What you get
- Economic + environmental screen from your uploaded utility or power data
- Waste-heat and district-heating recovery economics before commissioning an audit
- Payback-relevant outputs: avoided fuel, net operating savings, tCO2/year
- Stated assumptions and downside cases, in plain language
Triage feasibility before it eats the quarter.
Purpose-built screens for hardware questions that normally wait on a specialist: thin-wall cylindrical membranes, SOEC fabrication time, battery thermal identifiability, desalination, and bounded PV output.
Every run states its assumptions and returns sensitivity views, so feasibility triage happens in hours — and the next experiment gets chosen with the physics in view.
What you get
- Feasibility triage: membrane, SOEC fabrication-time, battery thermal identifiability, desalination, and bounded PV screens
- Which-parameter-matters sensitivities, not just a headline number
- Downside cases shown alongside base cases
- Briefs that split verified math from open assumptions
Report reductions you can defend.
Quantify what avoiding on-site combustion is actually worth: avoided boiler fuel and emissions set against added electricity, reported as net operational CO2 reduction in tCO2/year.
Less fuel burned also means fewer local air-quality impacts, so briefs surface those co-benefits alongside the carbon numbers — with the verification ledger marking what is machine-checked against your data and what is not.
What you get
- Net CO2 reduction: avoided boiler emissions minus added electricity emissions
- Fuel, cost, and emissions computed side by side from the same inputs
- Air-quality and health co-benefit context for reduced combustion
- A verification ledger that stands up to internal scrutiny
Exergy Lab is in beta. Every brief carries a verification ledger: it marks the claims that were machine-checked against your data and calls out the ones that remain explicitly unverifiable — no silent confidence. Plans are Free, Plus at $19/month, and Pro at $99/month; checkout availability can vary during beta.